March 6, 2008


  1. NothingInParticular | daniel@witherall.orangehome.co.uk | IP: 144.98.76.45

    Hey man, long time looker, first time blogger.

    Questions: In!

    Do you chose to write reviews for bands that you might not personally listen to or are your reviews influenced by your personal taste? For example, I may not be a pop fan, but it is quite obvious that Girls Aloud and the Sugarbabes are a cut above The Vengaboys and Scooch et al…

    Are you consciously aware of some things you’d like to write about a CD/DVD before you listen to/see it?

    It is impossible to go into a film like, say, Cloverfield without being drowned in pre-conceptions first. Do you avoid reviewing DVD’s if you are somewhat put off by too much hype or bad word-of-mouth or do you just encorparate that into the review? Is it sometimes best not to read up on a film before you see it?

    I apologise for the length of these.

    Questions: Out!

    Le Witherall

    Mar 6, 12:13 PM — [ Edit | Delete | Unapprove | Approve | Spam ] — Welcome… and shit

In answer to your questions Dan….

When reviewing bands, I don’t request to review anything I don’t think i’ll like. Although I’m often supplied CD’s I didn’t request, mind, so have reviewed albums by dark metal bands like Dew Scented in the past. It’s easier to write about genres you know than those you’re not, and you can only review things by comparing them to the benchmark of their genre.

I don’t think it’s fair to review things you know you’ll hate just to wallow in the fun of slagging them off (The Business excepted).

Yes, sometimes I am consciously aware of how to start a review before i hear it (if it’s someone i know a lot about them already), although more in a stylistic sense than any form of pre-judgement.

I try not to read other people’s reviews before I review someone’s CD’s, just because you’re opinion (and that’s all a review is) inevitably gets influenced by someone elses. That said, I don’t obsess about it, and once you’ve formed the base of the review, it’s useful to read around the band to inject more life into your own stuff.

Pre-conception is inevitably going to influence your  review, whether something has been hyped to death or made by an unsigned band. It’s fairer to be harsh on a hyped act that has spent millions on PR than an unsigned band with low production quality, selling CD’s from a suitcase.

Is that all Withy?

Entry Filed under: Uncategorized. .

1 Comment Add your own

  • 1. NothingInParticular  |  March 12, 2008 at 8:26 am

    I think so yeah cheers butt

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Calendar

March 2008
M T W T F S S
« Feb   Jul »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Most Recent Posts